Hi,
I personally have a bad experience with the de driver in general. When using it with
ZNYX 4 port cards which have 4 21140A chips it has all kinds of problems, which Vinod
described in an earlier message (I attached hereby).
The probem occours also on NetBSD (but the same driver code is mos
Hello,
I have just downloaded the latest, greatest -Stable (18-feb-00) and I can't get it to
load as the second BSD version on my machine.
I have a specific partitioning scheme :
*** Working on device /dev/rwd0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=827 heads=3
Title: RE: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates...
Actually RAID 0 is disk striping with *NO* redundancy. RAID *1* is mirroring.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 6:31 PM
To: Brad Knowles
Cc: Clifto
I have a machine here with 2 3C905B-TX's, during heavy traffic I get:
xl0: command never completed!
xl1: command never completed!
I reverted to using my Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+'s and I'm fine here.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using 3c905b-TX NICs in 4 servers he
Hello,
(I was trying to install 3.4-Stable as a second version of FreeBSD on a small disk)
I have installed "by hand" the bin distribution on these partitions :
root : ad0s2a :
The data for partition 2 is:
sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
start 100800, size 100800 (49 Meg), flag 0
At 11:08 PM 2/17/00 -0800, Jorge Aldana wrote:
>Before you go out and buy any card make sure the network you're plugging
>it into is going to work with it. Huh, you say. Well we had all Intel
>Pro/100's working just fine (although we had to muck with ifconfig as
>follows for 100BT ifconfig_fxp0="i
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:30:28AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Jeffrey J. Mountin once stated:
>
> =Frankly I can't see anyone using a 3Com considering all the problems
> =that crop up on the lists, but then I've been happy with Intel NIC
> =since the Pro100B came out. ;)
>
> Ok, so
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
[...]
: What switch? And why set the media? "Bonkers" is a bit vague.
:
: The Intel autosenses speed/duplex well with Intel, 3Com, and Cisco switches
: from my dealings with and does so with FBSD or Win 9x/NT. Can't say the
: same about 3Com 9xx (
We upgraded to a newer Xylan Omni Switch/Router basically for more ports
from an older Xylan (same model) with less ports. On the older Xylan we
had to force the Media to 100baseTX otherwise the intel's would drop to
10base on reboots. With the new switch the Intel cards would have trouble
with fu
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 12:50:24PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> At 11:08 PM 2/17/00 -0800, Jorge Aldana wrote:
> >Before you go out and buy any card make sure the network you're plugging
> >it into is going to work with it. Huh, you say. Well we had all Intel
> >Pro/100's working just fine (
Just an FYI:
I've got 4 3c905's in this box (one on-board, 3 in slots),
all seeing fairly heavy use, and haven't ever experienced this
problem. Maybe I'm just lucky.
SB
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
> I've gotten reports of the 3Com NIC's dropping packets in a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Tom wrote:
> >
> > Not really. You could just use async updates instead of softupdates.
> > Or an OS that uses async updates. Write caching metadata is always faster
> > than re-ordering it intelligently.
>
> Softupdates reduces the number of w
13 matches
Mail list logo
