hello.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Max Khon wrote:
> ftp://iclub.nsu.ru/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/fbsdboot.exe
> I have not tested it. Tell me if it works or not.
it can boot elf cernels, but i have:
no init
panic: no init
rebooting at N seconds...
maybe i must specify root devi
The ability to load and start a kernel != the ability to boot and run
same.
You cannot boot and run FreeBSD once DOS has been booted on the system.
You should give up now before you waste any more of your or our time.
There are good technical reasons why this is the case. If you don't
unde
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav
> writes:
> > It doesn't have anything to do with syn floods at all. It merely
> > prevents OS fingerprinting (at least the way nmap does it).
> The following ipfw rule will als
At 18:23 00/01/12 , Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "DB" == David Berard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>DB> I upgrade my system from freebsd 2.X to freebsd 3.X stable of yesterday,
>DB> since this, my printer (HP LaserJet 6L) stop working correctly with
>big DB> files (no txt files).
>
>Same problem
Coleman Kane once stated:
=Hi, I have now noticed that I can no longer play Quake3 under the new
=linux emulation, v6.1. It dies with invalid system call and dumps the
=core. Is this a problem of mine, or has anyone else experienced crashes
=from the new linux libs?
I can no longer use the
As I recall, Bob K wrote:
> Just as an aside, I spent all day today using an 80286 laptop with
> DOS-in-ROM (running TeleMate off a floppy). Now this has got me wondering
> if PicoBSD would run on that thing...
Don't think so. The FreeBSD kernel needs 80386 hardware registers
and memory managem
FWIW, I am having the exact same problems, except I'm not running
softupdates, only vinum. The box is an Asus P2B-DS, dual PII-333s,
Matrox G200, XFree86. The non-dying process I can live with. The big
problems that I see is that shutdown/reboot/halt is very inconsistent in
it's behavior. The 3 co
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
>
> UCB and AT&T had agreed that there were to be no new releases of BSD
> and that 4BSD was the final release. 4.1BSD - 4.4BSD were named such
> because they were "officially" only modifications to 4BSD and
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote:
|Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:14:56 -0700 (MST)
|From: Chad R. Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: Agent Drek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: access floppy rw to lock system
|
|As I recall, Agent Drek wrote:
|>
|> I have a repeatable p
