Thank you mailinglist,
That was a lot of info. First of all, I don't think this is a cpu issue
since the cpu is mostly idle while copying.
Second, I tried the hacks in loader.conf and the other ones mentioned in the
beginning of the thread. Allthough perfomance is somewhat increased, it is
still h
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Chadwick"
Based on my experiences at home, I converted my desktop at work to
pure ZFS. The only issues I've run into have been programs that
extensively use mmap(2) - which is a known issue with ZFS.
Is your ZFS root filesystem associated with a po
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:47:47 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> There's a link to www.dan.me.uk at the bottom of the above Wiki page
> that outlines "the madness" that's required to configure the setup,
> all of which has to be done by hand. I don't know many
> administrators who are going to tolera
On 12/31/2010 6:47 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:33:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Based on my experiences at home, I converted my desktop at work to
pure ZFS. The only issues I've run into have been programs that
extensively use mmap(2) - which is a known issue with
On 2010-Dec-31 15:47:47 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>Is your ZFS root filesystem associated with a pool that's mirrored or
>using raidzX?
Currently, mirrored. I'm considering raidz1 at home. Note that my
work system is a single pool, whereas I'll use a separate pool for
root at home.
> What
On 2010-Dec-30 02:31:30 -0500, Adam Stylinski wrote:
>I can tell you what the problem is right now, actually. ZFS performs
>very poorly on low performance CPUs (i.e. your Atom N330).
I would disagree. In this case, the op's most serious problem is a
bug in
sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/commo
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:33:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Dec-30 07:20:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >The reason I've not installed ZFS on root is because of the added
> >complications. I run the OS on ufs (with gmirror) and my data is on
> >ZFS. We must be hanging out with di
On 2010-Dec-30 07:20:57 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>The reason I've not installed ZFS on root is because of the added
>complications. I run the OS on ufs (with gmirror) and my data is on
>ZFS. We must be hanging out with different groups. Most of the people
>I know don't have ZFS on root.
On 30/12/2010 12:20, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 12/30/2010 4:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Yes, if you're booting from ZFS and you're using gpt to partition the
>> disks, as described at http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/
>> et seq. That's pro
On 12/30/2010 4:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
As Jean-Yves pointed out: upgrade not update. Some word beginning with
'up' anyhow.
# gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gpt
On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
>> them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
As Jean-Yves pointed out: upgrade not update. Some word beginning with
'up' anyhow.
>> # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad0
> This part applies only if
I can tell you what the problem is right now, actually. ZFS performs very
poorly on low performance CPUs (i.e. your Atom N330). Try the same system with
a different CPU and you'll get a different result. It's not a lack of
bandwidth on your bus, memory, or disks, and it's not exactly the chec
On 12/29/2010 12:47 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 29/12/2010 08:57, Freek van Hemert wrote:
The hacks sounds good until 8.2 is released however, regarding this upgrade,
is the on-disk format the same? Can I just add the pool to a new install (of
8.2-RC) and expect higher performance? Or do I need
On Thursday, 30 December 2010, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> No -- the on-disk format is different. ZFS will run fine with the older
> on-disk formats, but you won't get the full benefits without updating
> them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
I believe it's "upgrad
On 29/12/2010 08:57, Freek van Hemert wrote:
> The hacks sounds good until 8.2 is released however, regarding this upgrade,
> is the on-disk format the same? Can I just add the pool to a new install (of
> 8.2-RC) and expect higher performance? Or do I need to recreate the pool
> with the newer vers
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Stefan Huerter wrote:
> Guckux Freek
>
> > The hacks sounds good until 8.2 is released however, regarding this
> > upgrade,
> > is the on-disk format the same? Can I just add the pool to a new install
> > (of
> > 8.2-RC) and expect higher performance? Or d
Guckux Freek
> The hacks sounds good until 8.2 is released however, regarding this
> upgrade,
> is the on-disk format the same? Can I just add the pool to a new install
> (of
> 8.2-RC) and expect higher performance? Or do I need to recreate the pool
> with the newer versions of the utilities?
jus
?
On 29 December 2010 09:38, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 28/12/2010 23:56, Freek van Hemert wrote:
> > I have a question regarding zfs on freebsd.
> > (I'm making a home server)
> > This afternoon I did a "zpool create data mirror ad4 ad6" Now I'm copying
> &
On 28/12/2010 23:56, Freek van Hemert wrote:
> I have a question regarding zfs on freebsd.
> (I'm making a home server)
> This afternoon I did a "zpool create data mirror ad4 ad6" Now I'm copying
> things from my ufs2 disk into the 2TB zpool, it is very slow. I
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Freek van Hemert wrote:
> Top tells me: 761 MB Active, 790 Inactive and there is hardly any cpu usage
> (96-98% idle). vfs.numvnodes: around 12500 now (after several hours of
> copying) and stil slowly rising.
>
> Hope you can help me.
>
I believe there were some
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:56:57AM +0100, Freek van Hemert wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is my first mail on the mailinglist and I very much appreciate this
> option of getting some help.
>
> I have a question regarding zfs on freebsd.
> (I'm making a home server
Hello everyone,
This is my first mail on the mailinglist and I very much appreciate this
option of getting some help.
I have a question regarding zfs on freebsd.
(I'm making a home server)
This afternoon I did a "zpool create data mirror ad4 ad6" Now I'm copying
things from m
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:56:46 -0700
Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007 01:49 pm, Christian Walther wrote:
> > The other one is http://www.blastwave.org
> > There is a nice script called "pkg-add" available, that is similar
> > to apt-get.
>
> Wouldn't pkgsrc be a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:39:57 +0100 "Claus Guttesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: zfs on FreeBSD:
CG> And that's when I'm once again is convinced that the
CG> FreeBSD-ports-collection is one of the best package-repositories
CG> around and hence was curio
> > Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without
> > problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an
> > intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as
> > 'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeB
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 01:49 pm, Christian Walther wrote:
> On 21/03/07, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without
> > problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10
On 21/03/07, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without
problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an
intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as
'portins
On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without
problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an
intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as
'portinstall postfix&#
Hi.
Probably a bit premature but has anyone used zfs on FreeBSD "without
problems". The reason I ask is that I have installed Solaris 10 on an
intel-box, but adding additional programs is *not* as easy as
'portinstall postfix' etc. on FreeBSD. So rather than doing sensible
29 matches
Mail list logo
