Hi,
feel free to register with FirstnameLastname in the wiki and tell us about it.
We provide write access to people which seriously want to help improve the wiki
content.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors.
Charles Spr
Hi,
a possible soution would be to start a wiki pagee with what you know, e.g. a
page which explains that solaris and zio* belong to ZFS. Over time people can
extend with additional info.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
erro
Hi,
this only applies to old systems (slooow disks, no NCQ support), or very fast
USB3 memory sticks. Current (I would say at least 2-3 year old) hardware is
slowed down by USB2.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors.
Fred
Hi,
if you are not using USB3 and a fast memory stick, it will be slower than
swapping to disk.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors.
Freddie Cash hat geschrieben:On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25
AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrot
Hi.
On 09.02.2012 14:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
And please take the reports after discrepancy between ARC size an wired size is
large enough, like e.g. 1GB. That's when they are useful.
One more thing - this machine is running a debug/ddb kernel, so just in
order to save two weeks - when/if it w
Hi.
On 09.02.2012 14:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
And please take the reports after discrepancy between ARC size an wired size is
large enough, like e.g. 1GB. That's when they are useful.
Okay, I wrote a short script capturing sequence of top -b/zfs-stats
-a/vmstat -m/vmstat -z in a timestamped fi
on 09/02/2012 10:33 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 09/02/2012 06:27 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
>> The output I promised (if it's MORE acceptable in the form of a link to a
>> paste
>> site, just say it):
>
> I prefer links, but both ways are acceptable to me.
> Just one more hi
on 09/02/2012 06:27 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> The output I promised (if it's MORE acceptable in the form of a link to a
> paste
> site, just say it):
I prefer links, but both ways are acceptable to me.
Just one more hint on the reporting. The most useful reports are coherent
repor
Hi.
On 09.02.2012 02:29, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:18:02PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/02/2012 22:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > Politely -- recommending this to a user is a good choice of action, but
> > the problem is that no user, even an experienced user, is going to know
> > what all of the "Types"
On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> ...
>>> ARC Size:
>>> Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
>>> Target Size (Adaptive): 51
On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just c
Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
...
ARC Size:
Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
Target Size (Adaptive): 512 MB (c)
Min Size (Hard Limit):
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
...
>> ARC Size:
>> Current Size: 1769 MB (arcsize)
>> Target Size (Adaptive): 512 MB (c)
>> Min Size (Hard Limit): 512 MB (zfs_arc
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>[output snipped]
> >>>
> >>>Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that examination of vmstat -m
on 08/02/2012 22:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> Politely -- recommending this to a user is a good choice of action, but
> the problem is that no user, even an experienced user, is going to know
> what all of the "Types" (vmstat -m) or "ITEMs" (vmstat -z) correlate
> with on the system.
I
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:29:36PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> [output snipped]
> >>
> >> Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
> >> Just case, do you have
on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Hi.
>
> On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> [output snipped]
>>
>> Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
>> Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
>>
>> I think that examination of vmstat -m an
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin
> wrote:
>> On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
>>> now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
>> now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place which tells that
>> the problems with SWAP on ZFS are fixed:
>
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe
now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place which tells that
the problems with SWAP on ZFS are fixed:
1. do not use SWAP on ZFS
2. see 1.
3. check if you see the
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:31:44 +0600 "Eugene M. Zheganin"
wrote:
> swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer
>
> Since it's swapping on zvol, it looks to me like it could be the
> mentioned in another thread here ("Swap on zvol - recommendable?")
> resource starvation issue; may be it happens faster wh
Hi.
On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[output snipped]
Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there.
Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance?
I think that examination of vmstat -m and vmstat -z outputs may provide some
clues as to what got all that memory wired
on 07/02/2012 18:03 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Hi.
>
> On 07.02.2012 21:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure that these conclusions are correct. Wired is wired, it's not
>> free.
>> BTW, are you reluctant to share the full zfs-stats -a output? You don't
>> have to
>> place
Hi.
On 07.02.2012 21:51, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am not sure that these conclusions are correct. Wired is wired, it's not
free.
BTW, are you reluctant to share the full zfs-stats -a output? You don't have to
place it inline, you can upload it somewhere and provide a link.
Well... nothing secr
on 07/02/2012 17:35 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Okay, thank you once again, it made me more clear what is happening to the
> memory:
>
>
> System Memory:
>
> 4.39% 172.47 MiB Active, 0.29% 11.53 MiB Inact
> 90.68% 3.48GiB Wired, 3.54% 138.98
Hi.
On 07.02.2012 17:43, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/02/2012 13:34 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
Hi.
On 07.02.2012 16:46, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says:
===Cut==
on 07/02/2012 13:34 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Hi.
>
> On 07.02.2012 16:46, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
>>> If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says:
>>>
>>> ===Cut===
>>> ARC Size:
Hi.
On 07.02.2012 16:46, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says:
===Cut===
ARC Size: 12.50% 363.14 MiB
Target Size: (Adaptive) 12.5
on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following:
> Hi.
>
> I have a server with 9.0/amd64 and 4 Gigs of RAM.
> Today's questions are about the amount of memory in 'wired' state and the ARC
> size.
>
> If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says:
>
> ===Cu
Hi.
I have a server with 9.0/amd64 and 4 Gigs of RAM.
Today's questions are about the amount of memory in 'wired' state and
the ARC size.
If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says:
===Cut===
ARC Size: 12.50% 363.14 MiB
Ta
32 matches
Mail list logo
