It's sent out weekly.
So only people which are on bugbusters@ receive it. If someone is
interested in this but is not interested in the other bugbusters@
mails, they will not see it.
Actually apart from this thread that weekly email is the only traffic
on bugbusters@
_
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 29 Dec 2007
22:26:02 -0600):
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
12:04:15 -0600):
> - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister tea
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
> 12:04:15 -0600):
>
> > - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are
> > ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted th
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
12:04:15 -0600):
- The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are
ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted the desired
attention. Perhaps this is a problem of "push" not being the righ
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:48 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : Look at it from my perspective: I would be h
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:48 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Look at it from my perspective: I would be happy to complete my fix for
> : the infamous five-year-old usb/46176, so people can finally detach
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Look at it from my perspective: I would be happy to complete my fix for
: the infamous five-year-old usb/46176, so people can finally detach umass
: devices without having to manually unmount them first. Ho
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Henrik Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Fixing and merging are good, but it seems to me (as an occasional patch
> contributor without commit privileges) that the bottleneck for USB is
> still in the handling of incoming patches [...] if a one-line fix
> such as that in
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 00:35 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : If we want people to give FreeBSD a try in good faith, it is both
> profoundly
> : stupid and dishonest on our part to claim, we have a working
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: If we want people to give FreeBSD a try in good faith, it is both profoundly
: stupid and dishonest on our part to claim, we have a working USB-system... It
: does not matter, how great our buffer-sharing VM
On субота 22 грудень 2007, Mike Tancsa wrote:
= Perhaps its the one card reader you are using is particularly
= problematic ? I have been using the multi-type cheapo reader below
= for some time
Perhaps. But /nothing/ excuses devfs hanging for 25 minutes. Nothing. It
should be more resilient to
At 11:41 PM 12/21/2007, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Another attempt to use USB-storage with FreeBSD, another moment of
hair-pulling frustration.
I attach the card-reader with the media card already inserted (detection of
card-insertion has not worked in a long time, if ever).
Perhaps its the one ca
Another attempt to use USB-storage with FreeBSD, another moment of
hair-pulling frustration.
I attach the card-reader with the media card already inserted (detection of
card-insertion has not worked in a long time, if ever).
The "disk" appears:
umass1: Genesys USB Reader, rev 2.00/91.3
13 matches
Mail list logo
