Re: top/systat

2001-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
[skip] > When you try to run top, it looks for the symbol that represents nlist, > and when it can't find it, it doesn't know where to find the nlist > kernel function. I'm guessing nlist has something to do with a process > list... hence, when top can't find nlist, it throws a fit. I think nlis

Re: top/systat

2001-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
Yeah, except that it doesn't list my problem. Well, now when I look at it I realize that if I was any smarter I'd figure it out, but I just looked at it and said to myself "Your kernel and userland are not synchronized?" nope, that's not me, and kind of ignored tha second part of the paragraph whi

Re: top/systat

2001-03-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:14:21AM -0500, Mikhail Kruk wrote: > Hi, > So what's up with nlist in systat and top? > > Here is the output of systat: > > systat: nlist: can't find following symbols: > _ccpu > _fscale See the FAQ. Kris PGP signature

Re: top/systat

2001-03-09 Thread Andrew Hesford
I'm probably going to make an ass out of myself¸ which has certainly happened before. Still, a disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about. Take everything I say with the whole canister of salt. As I understand it, a symbol describes the relative entry point of a function in a given block of

Re: top, systat )-: (all rebuilt!)

2000-03-28 Thread Mikhail Teterin
The patches did the trick for me... -mi =On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:53:20AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: => Ruslan Ermilov once stated: => => =Do you use loader(8), or directly boot your kernel from boot blocks? => => Directly... Is that what it is?!? => =Yes, starting from the followin