On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:55:00PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
> Yes, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that my 6.1 partition
> has a bad block in .. say.. libc that's delaying reads and causing me
> trouble, I just remember installing 6.1 and thinking "OUCH".
>
> I get the impression th
Yes, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that my 6.1 partition
has a bad block in .. say.. libc that's delaying reads and causing me
trouble, I just remember installing 6.1 and thinking "OUCH".
I get the impression that this is a latency issue more then a bandwidth
issue (responsiveness vs
At 11:44 AM -0600 4/12/06, Scott Long wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I didn't think this was a 6.1 regression compared to 6.0,
but 6.x compared to 4.x. It would be good to try and
quantify any performance differences here - so far it's
just a b
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
done".
> I
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:43PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
> >> I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
> >> performance under 6.x is slower the
At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
done".
> I noticed that 6.1 seemed to b
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
> I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
> performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
> done".
>
> I noticed that 6.1 seemed to be a dog, but 6.0 I thought was better. As
> a t
I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
done".
I noticed that 6.1 seemed to be a dog, but 6.0 I thought was better. As
a test I installed 6.0 and 6.1 in parallel on my laptop with identical
ports tr
