Le Thu, 10 May 2012 14:33:12 -0400,
Charles Owens a écrit :
Hello,
> Lastly, since we're talking about this (for the future) -- is
> enabling of superpages generally recommended for amd64?
They are enabled by default (at least on 9.0)
$ sysctl vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled
vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled: 1
Re
On 5/10/12 12:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Charles Owens
mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:
That's very helpful! I had read about that and wondered if it
applied to i386.
Should I have expected "superpages" to completely cure the
condition.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Charles Owens wrote:
> That's very helpful! I had read about that and wondered if it applied to
> i386.
>
> Should I have expected "superpages" to completely cure the condition... or
> does it just help? Should I now be looking at tuning the related pmap
> sys
That's very helpful! I had read about that and wondered if it applied
to i386.
Should I have expected "superpages" to completely cure the condition...
or does it just help? Should I now be looking at tuning the related
pmap sysctls to give further relief?
Thanks!
Charles
On 5/10/12 11:2
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Charles Owens
> wrote:
>
> > Hi fellow BSD-types,
> >
> > I have a buy system that forks lots of processes and I see repeatedly the
> > message: "Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing
> e
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Charles Owens
wrote:
> Hi fellow BSD-types,
>
> I have a buy system that forks lots of processes and I see repeatedly the
> message: "Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either
> the vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max tunable".
>
Hi fellow BSD-types,
I have a buy system that forks lots of processes and I see repeatedly
the message: "Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing
either the vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max tunable". My
research suggested that enabling the "superpages" feature
