Am Samstag, 22. Januar 2005 15:52 schrieb Shunsuke Akiyama:
[...]
> Good work!
>
> I've updated your patch. If attached patch works correctly with new
> revision chip, I'll commit this. Please test attached patch, and tell
> me the result.
I tested it (after removing the DOS ^M characters) again
At Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:18:30 +0100,
Michal Mertl wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > > Dear experts,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have two USB-RS2
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
>
> > I tested my patch for binary safety on CURRENT yesterday (dialed with
> > ppp) and didn't notice any problem.
> >
> > I'm attaching my patch again because some recipients didn't probably
> > receive it yester
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
> I tested my patch for binary safety on CURRENT yesterday (dialed with
> ppp) and didn't notice any problem.
>
> I'm attaching my patch again because some recipients didn't probably
> receive it yesterday.
This didn't apply cleanly again
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
> > works for both chips on CURRENT for serial console. It detects if the
> > chip is rev 3.00 and aplies the patch only for it.
> >
> > The author of the patch mentions it isn't binary safe - sometimes the
> > chip stops working. I planne
I wrote:
> Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > Dear experts,
> > > >
> > > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > > the other o
Sorry to reply to myself but I would better really attach the patch.
I wrote:
> Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > Dear experts,
> > > >
> > > > I have two USB-RS232
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Dear experts,
> > >
> > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > the other one not (I hate to say i
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Dear experts,
> > >
> > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > the other one not (I hate to say i
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Dear experts,
> >
> > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > the other one not (I hate to say it but both are working under win).
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
> > The not working (more expensive) one gets recognized as ucom0 and I have
> > ucom0, also I can receive signal but not transmit.
> >
> [skip]
>
> Take a look at http://gate.intercaf.ru/~lesha/6100/ and try patch
> http://gate.intercaf.ru/~lesha/
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
> I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working the
> other one not (I hate to say it but both are working under win).
>
> The not working (more expensive) one gets recognized as ucom0 and
Dear experts,
I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working the
other one not (I hate to say it but both are working under win).
The not working (more expensive) one gets recognized as ucom0 and I have
ucom0, also I can receive signal but not transmit.
When I connect
13 matches
Mail list logo
