On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > PAM is considered to be an integral part of the system
> > thesedays; as such there's no support for compiling without
> > it.
>
> I was trying to trim FreeBSD to below 16MB and to run it
> as an embedded system. I find
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> >
> > I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> > the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
> > ssh does not obey it. I
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:42:48PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> > >
> > > I was loo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:42:48PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > BTW, is th
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
> >
> >
> > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
> >
> > I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> > the NOPAM compiler flag.
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:
>
>
> > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
>
> I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
> the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
> ssh does not obey it. I have some unteste
> BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system?
I was looking at it a couple months back. There is
the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and
ssh does not obey it. I have some untested patch
at home before I got too busy with other non-FreeBSD
things
