FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1/OpenLDAP/PAM: passwd: Sorry, `passwd' can only change passwords for local or NIS users.

2007-10-27 Thread O. Hartmann
Users can not change their passwords on a machine which performs authentication via OpenLDAP/pam_ldap/nss_ldap facilities. I read about a patch, bu t is there another way to make this possible as a standard facility in sources? Ragards, Oliver ___ fr

Sorry, your message was BLOCKED because it contains certain types of file attachments.

2006-11-24 Thread Proofpoint Protection Server
Please note that emails containing attachments with the following file types are blocked from entering our system: 386, 3gr, add, ade, asp, bas, bat, chm, cmd, com, cpl, crt, dbx, dll, exe, fon, hta, inf, ins, isp, js, jse, lnk, mde, msc, msi, msp, mst, ocx, pcd, pif, reg, scr, sct, shs, shb, vb,

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread Mitch \(Bitblock\)
Hey David! [Mitch says:] > The handbook document should point to > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ instead (I think there's a > problem report with a patch under review). > > Yes, the -STABLE branch exists. That's how you would patch a 6.0-RELEASE > system: using cvsup(1) to follow

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread David Adam
Mitch, On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Mitch (Bitblock) wrote: > > > From: "Mitch \(Bitblock\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:15:57 -0800 > > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The handbook > > > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current- > > stable.ht > > >

RE: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-02 Thread Mitch \(Bitblock\)
> > From: "Mitch \(Bitblock\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:15:57 -0800 > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The handbook > > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current- > stable.ht > > ml#STABLE) references > ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/s

Re: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-01 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: "Mitch \(Bitblock\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 16:15:57 -0800 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The handbook > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.ht > ml#STABLE) references ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ > - whic

Re: OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-01 Thread David Syphers
On Sunday 01 January 2006 04:15 pm, Mitch (Bitblock) wrote: > The handbook > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.h >t ml#STABLE) references > ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ - which doesn't seem > to contain any 6.0 files newer than 2004?

OK - I'm stumped - where IS stable? Sorry if it seems like a dumb question but I looked in the handbook...

2006-01-01 Thread Mitch \(Bitblock\)
The handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.ht ml#STABLE) references ftp://snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ - which doesn't seem to contain any 6.0 files newer than 2004? The main FTP site doesn't contain a "branches" folder for anything

Re: help with cvsup refuse file (sorry wrong subject first)

2003-08-27 Thread michael
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:31:59AM +0200, michael wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i have used cvsup for first time and anything works fine, > > but i have get into trouble with the refuse file. > > I have read the refuse.README and now i have used the sample > > refuse from /usr/share/exa

sorry for posting to wrong list

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Wolkerstorfer
> I don't think this list is the right place to ask. try freebsd-questions > perhaps? oops. i am sorry for incommoding with mail "please help on 1(one) ipf rule" peter "wolki" wolkerstorfer To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscrib

Re: Sorry had to post this

2001-06-19 Thread Chad R. Larson
> If you use vim with mutt, you can set the vim arguments to be > > + -c "set textwidth=72" -c "set wrap" > > and it will wrap characters with the generally accepted standard > 72-column width. And, since this is a FreeBSD mailing list, and he =said= he used vi: set wraplen=68 for t

RE: Sorry had to post this

2001-06-19 Thread Arun Welch
> > The problem is not with my mailer but with the original poster's > mailer. My mailer is mutt + vi which doesn't insert stupid > newlines into a line to break it up. > Then your mailer isn't RFC-compliant... From 2822: There are two limits that this standard places on the number of

Re: Sorry had to post this

2001-06-19 Thread Scott Dodson
Exactly how many people need to verify that the link isn't broke in order for you to believe that it's working? Take a vacation... -- scott On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Scott Reese wrote: > The link IS broken. Even if you paste the entire URL into the browser, it > still says the page is unavailab

Re: Sorry had to post this

2001-06-19 Thread Andrew Hesford
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:18:22PM +0530, Angshuman Dasgupta wrote: > The problem is not with my mailer but with the original poster's mailer. My mailer >is mutt + vi which doesn't insert stupid newlines into a line to break it up. If your mailer doesn't break lines up, then you do have a probl

CFLAGS Optimization (I'm very sorry!!!)

2001-05-08 Thread Nuno Teixeira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello to all, I just want to say that I'm very sorry about the confusion that I've created on this mailing. I'm the one that posted this message, but isn't my intention to create confusions and discussions between the FreeBSD ma

Thanks for all the help - fixed - ya party. RE: Sorry, but this 4.3 box has me totally stumped.

2001-04-06 Thread Robert
Thanks Jeff I think that did it. I looked at that before - and then didn't get back to do anything with it. Just let me check. Yup, after rebooting everything ... brute force :-) It all works. All I did was uncomment the "enable proxy" line . "Takes branch and begins seriously whipping sel

Re: Sorry! Unable to transfer

2000-12-16 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:40:38PM -0800, Glendon Gross wrote: I guess the PC98 servers are not on the first cdrom but on one of the other 3. PC98 is only used to drive some Japanese standard for PCs so just don't bother I'd say. W/ > > I got the same errors. > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Nader Tu

Re: Sorry! Unable to transfer

2000-12-15 Thread Glendon Gross
I got the same errors. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Nader Turki wrote: > Hello all, > I just got the FreeBSD 4.2-R ISO for the 2nd time from > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/4.2-install.iso > > While installing the XFree86 Distribution I get few errors that says: > > Unabl

sorry

2000-11-22 Thread Thiago Lucas
Sorry for the question.. i found how i can fix it in "freebsd-stable archives". thanks --- Thiago Lucas To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Sudden name resolution problems? 4.0-R (sorry its not stable..)

2000-09-12 Thread David Raistrick
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What is in /etc/host.conf? Nothing that changed, at least. I have looked at it, and compared it with other still functioning systems: damoe:/usr/ports%> more /etc/host.conf # $FreeBSD: src/etc/host.conf,v 1.6 1999/08/27 23:23:41 peter Ex

Re: Sudden name resolution problems? 4.0-R (sorry its not stable..)

2000-09-12 Thread Mark . Andrews
What is in /etc/host.conf? Mark > > Sending this to stable, because you folks are used to dealing with wierd > problems like this...twice to -questions got no replies. > > Any ideasthanks > > -- > Ok, yesterday things got wierd. > > My workstation at work is running 4.0-R

Sudden name resolution problems? 4.0-R (sorry its not stable..)

2000-09-12 Thread David Raistrick
Sending this to stable, because you folks are used to dealing with wierd problems like this...twice to -questions got no replies. Any ideasthanks -- Ok, yesterday things got wierd. My workstation at work is running 4.0-R, and I recently changed the IP address. I kept the old IP bound as w

sorry

2000-08-23 Thread Salmons, Michael
obviously please ignore my previous message. How embarassing... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: I AM SORRY SORRY !!! FOR THE MAIL BOMBS

2000-07-24 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, net admin wrote: > I APOLOGIZE FOR THE MAIL BOMBS regarding 4-STABLE buildworld and telnetd. >It seems mutt was brocken after the upgrade and all postponed messages I had in the >buffer were sent when mutt was fixed causing a mail flood coming to the list sorry &

win98 (sorry!) and freebsd, wont boot?

2000-07-20 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
er, doesnt. pressing F2 just proofs that the speaker and the loud and annoying work. i cant boot into win98, it wouldnt work. so, please, does anyone know what i did wrong? anyone had the same problems? anyone knowing what i am talking about? anyone out there who can help me? sorry for that long an