sp_queue daemon.
And the read the lines about sendmail_enable!
>
> > Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but
> > after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable="NO"
> > in /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmai
Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
First, rc.conf and periodic.conf are totally separate, so having just one
knob for both isn't practical now, but might be an interesting project down
the road. Second, IIRC the first implementation of sendmail_enable=no did
act
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
> First, rc.conf and periodic.conf are totally separate, so having just one
> knob for both isn't practical now, but might be an interesting project down
> the road. Second, IIRC the first implementation of sendmail_enable=no did
> actual
l probably be at least until 7.0
that it continues to work.
Personally, I think having to set a bazillion variables to turn off
sendmail in rc.conf and periodic.conf is just a pain (and probably a
Strongly seconded. There should be one knob to disable the
entire thing. SENDMAIL_ENABLE=NO shou
that in 6.0 also, so it will probably be at least until 7.0
> that it continues to work.
>
> Personally, I think having to set a bazillion variables to turn off
> sendmail in rc.conf and periodic.conf is just a pain (and probably a
Strongly seconded. There should be one knob to disab
On Dec 31, 2005, at 6:56 PM, security wrote:
And the rc.sendmail(8) under 5.4 stable says that "NONE" is
deprecated and will be removed in a future release. According to
the man page,
It says that in 6.0 also, so it will probably be at least until 7.0
that it continues to work.
Person
moved in a future release. According to the man page,
To completely prevent any sendmail(8) daemons from starting, you must set
the following variables in /etc/rc.conf:
sendmail_enable="NO"
sendmail_submit_enable="NO"
sendmail_outbound_enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 10:46:37PM +, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Saturday, December 31, 2005 10:38 PM when we last met our heroes,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> was heard to say:
> > Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the
> > sendmail dae
> I've a feeling it's documented somewhere else, but can't remember
> right now.
The rc.conf(5) man page points to rc.sendmail(8) man page.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscrib
On Saturday, December 31, 2005 10:38 PM when we last met our heroes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> was heard to say:
> Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the
> sendmail daemon processes?
You want NONE. This isn't documented in the defaults file, but is apparent when
you look at the start
On 01/01/2006, at 9:38 AM, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the sendmail
daemon processes?
Have a read of /etc/defaults/rc.conf and try the
sendmail_enable="NONE" flag.
Ari Maniatis
-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Leve
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the sendmail daemon
> processes?
>
> It doesn't on my system, just confirmed this via a new system build. FYI.
>
> FreeBSD-6.0
Try sendmail_enable="NONE" and see what happens.
Using just "NO" will still start a sendma
Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the sendmail daemon
processes?
It doesn't on my system, just confirmed this via a new system build. FYI.
FreeBSD-6.0
_F
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
13 matches
Mail list logo
