Re: KDE mixup: was samba package

2002-02-07 Thread Murray Stokely
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:54:20AM +0200, Nevermind wrote: > > So, I take it you will volunteer to check the 6000+ ports & packages? > Wilko, I mean that we should make a list which should be like "core > packages". My proposal is: The list would be three times this long if you just include the

Re: KDE mixup: was samba package

2002-02-05 Thread JJ Behrens
> Sure. Why the kde meta-package was left out?? There was an unfortunate accident. The FreeBSD KDE team was attempting to reduce the amount of KDE material on the first CD, and (accidentally) the material didn't make it onto any of the CD's. > And teTeX?? teTeX was a dependency for KDE graphic

Re: samba package

2002-02-04 Thread Eric Olsen
On 4 Feb 2002 at 6:48, Bill Moran wrote: > On Monday 04 February 2002 06:05, Rostislav wrote: > > I just installed my new 4.5R box using the official CDs. It looks very > > strange but I can't find any samba package in any of 4 CDs? Does > > someone have any idea why t

Re: samba package

2002-02-04 Thread Rostislav
> On Monday 04 February 2002 06:05, Rostislav wrote: > > I just installed my new 4.5R box using the official CDs. It looks very > > strange but I can't find any samba package in any of 4 CDs? Does someone > > have any idea why the package wasn't included to CDs? In

Re: samba package

2002-02-04 Thread Bill Moran
On Monday 04 February 2002 06:05, Rostislav wrote: > I just installed my new 4.5R box using the official CDs. It looks very > strange but I can't find any samba package in any of 4 CDs? Does someone > have any idea why the package wasn't included to CDs? In contrast, the >

samba package

2002-02-04 Thread Rostislav
I just installed my new 4.5R box using the official CDs. It looks very strange but I can't find any samba package in any of 4 CDs? Does someone have any idea why the package wasn't included to CDs? In contrast, the samba package exist in ftp. Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail