Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just upgr
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
> >determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
> >the snapshot operation to finish.
>
> Just upgraded to 6.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just upgraded to 6.2-STABLE, and I must say that things are a LOT better:
- It did return a prompt
Kris Kennaway writes:
| Thanks for clarifying. Hopefully you and Tor can get something
| committed soon!
I'm not sure about that. I have to see what has changed since then.
That was ... uhm a year ago when I dropped the ball.
It's probably a good task for me to look at in the context of -curren
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:55:00PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> ..
>
> >>>The file-system would come to a stop, processes stuck on bio, snap-shots
> >>>not finishing etc. This was caused by the system running out of usable
> >>>buffers. The change forces them to
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:17:33PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> | On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:26:47PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> | > Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> | > >| > or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that
> | > >might
> | > >| > be requir
Kris Kennaway writes:
| On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:26:47PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
| > Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > >| > or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that
| > >might
| > >| > be required. As a hack on a local server we have been using snap shots
| > >| > to
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that might
| > be required. As a hack on a local server we have been using snap shots
| > to do a "hot" back-up of a data base each morning. This is based on
| > 6.x.
|
| What do you mean by "get wedged"? Ar
Kris Kennaway wrote:
..
The file-system would come to a stop, processes stuck on bio, snap-shots
not finishing etc. This was caused by the system running out of usable
buffers. The change forces them to be flushed every so often. This is
independant of locking. 10 might be to aggresive.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:26:47PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> >| > or things can get wedged. We have some other patches as well that
> >might
> >| > be required. As a hack on a local server we have been using snap shots
> >| > to do a "hot" back-up of a data base
Kris Kennaway writes:
| On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:13:57AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
|
| > FWIW, with this patch I find making snap-shots a lot more reliable:
| >
| > --- sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.orig Wed Mar 22 09:42:31 2006
| > +++ sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c Mon Nov 20 14:59:13 2006
| >
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:13:57AM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> FWIW, with this patch I find making snap-shots a lot more reliable:
>
> --- sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.orig Wed Mar 22 09:42:31 2006
> +++ sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.cMon Nov 20 14:59:13 2006
> @@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ restart:
>
/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
| >>
| >> Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
| >> The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
| >>
| >> I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mk
3G34% 565952 1828334700%
> >>>>
> >>>>Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
> >>>>The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
> >>>>
> >>>>I would like to make weekly snapsh
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
freezes access to the disk (I
vail Capacity iused ifree %iused
> >>/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
> >>
> >>Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
> >>The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
> >>
&
dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a
9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
> The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
>
> I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
> freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
> never terminates. So I let i
SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a gstat did not
reveil any activity what so ever...
The
t; The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
>
> I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
> freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
> never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a gstat did no
apacity iused ifree %iused
> >>/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
> >>
> >>Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
> >>The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
> >>
> >&g
core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a gstat
9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
> The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
>
> I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
> freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
> never terminates. So I let i
t; The system is used as SMB/NFS server for my other systems here.
>
> I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
> freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
> never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a gstat did no
.
I would like to make weekly snapshots, but manually running mksnap_ffs
freezes access to the disk (I sort of expected that) but the process
never terminates. So I let is sit overnight, but looking a gstat did not
reveil any activity what so ever...
The disk was not released, mksnap_ffs could
25 matches
Mail list logo
