Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-11-12 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
> Dear colleagues, > > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target > devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes > even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA300 disks in gmirror) Long and short of it, rrd sucks. I'm not sure whats sucks w

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-11-01 Thread Ivan Voras
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dear colleagues, > > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes

RE: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-31 Thread Helge.Oldach
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote on Monday, October 29, 2007 9:13 AM: > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target > devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or > sometimes even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA300 disks in gmirror) This is how rrdtool b

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:32:41PM -0700, Michael Hall wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:58:00AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > * A suite/library on Sourceforge somewhere which I cannot remember the > > name of, but acted as a data-over-time storage/graphing/plotting > > alternative to RRD

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071030 02:30] wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > AP> * Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071029 12:44] wrote: > AP> > > AP> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, > in > AP> > [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Michael Hall
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:58:00AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > 2) Consider alternative software such as: > > * http://torrus.org/ > * http://www.dynw.com/iog/ > * A suite/library on Sourceforge somewhere which I cannot remember the > name of, but acted as a data-over-time storage/graphing

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:32:42PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brooks Davis wrote: > > BD> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > BD> > > BD> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, > in > BD> > [EMAIL PR

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes even 3 > mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA300 disks in gmirror) Ideas: 1) Stop

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brooks Davis wrote: BD> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: BD> > BD> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in BD> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] BD> > BD> > Dear colleagues, BD> > BD> > any hints to tune rrdtool wit

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote: AP> * Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071029 12:44] wrote: AP> > AP> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in AP> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] AP> > AP> > Dear colleagues, AP> > AP> > any hints to tune rrdtool with

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
[hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear colleagues, any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA3

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
Have you tried the latest beta which has had quite a rework in terms of IO. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: "Dmitry Morozovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear colleagues, any h

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071029 12:44] wrote: > > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dear colleagues, > > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-bound, sh

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dear colleagues, > > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-boun

rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-29 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
[hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear colleagues, any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA3