Re: Upgrade to 4.8 STABLE - Root mount failed: 6

2003-10-01 Thread Doug White
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Madis wrote: > > diff of them seems like normal, i found no intresting differences > i have no idea what i do next, i want to upgrade my system, cause there are > security updates (thats not meaning i have old sshd &bind and others, they > are installed via ports) > i dont thi

root mount failed: 22

2003-03-19 Thread Fredrick Nilsson
Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle Mounting root from ufs:/dev/md0c da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 20.000MB/S Transferes (20.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 4341MB (8890760 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4341C) Root Mount Failed:

"Root mount failed" in 3.5-Stable to 4.1-Release upgrade

2001-07-26 Thread Russell D. Murphy Jr.
mounting root from ufs:wd0s2a wd0: bad sector table not supported wd0s2a: bad sector table not supported Root mount failed: 22 I tried asking it to boot from ad0s2a, ad0s2, ad0, wd0s2a, wd0s2, and wd0 with the same results. If I boot kernel.old (3.5-Stable), I can boot, but can't

Re: root mount failed

2000-07-23 Thread Mike Hoskins
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Charles Martin wrote: > no devsw (majdev=0 bootdev=0xa030) > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > no such device 'ad' > setrootbyname failed > ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp > Root mount failed: 6 Uhh... What is (or, better yet, isn&#