Hi, Colin. Any news/thoughts on where we are with this?
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I'm not clear on how this helps. We don't know if there will be a
need to produce a 6.5 release, so there's no way to judge whether 6.4
should be designated "final" or not. The only logical answer is to do
so, which leaves a substantial chance
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Each branch is supported by the Security Officer for a limited time
> only, and is designated as one of `Early adopter', `Normal', or
> Final'. The designation is used as a guideline for determining the
> lifetime of the branch as follows.
I'm not clear on h
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:37 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Normal
Releases which are published from a -STABLE branch will be
supported by the Security Officer for a minimum of 12 months after
the
release.
A release which is not the final minor release of a branch will
be additionally supported
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:37 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
> following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
> is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
> discussion and there's nobody d
Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this is
what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discussion and there's nobody demanding anything here. It just seems
"
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
jonathan michaels wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with
the following suggestions to change the support policy.
Obviously, this is what we feel wo
jonathan michaels wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discu
freebsd-stable et al ...
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
> following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
> is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discussion and there's nobody demanding anything here. It just seems
"better".
Old te
10 matches
Mail list logo
