Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-11-07 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > * Joan Picanyol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 18:09]: > > * Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 14:24]: > > > - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than > > > "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, do

Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-11-07 Thread Joan Picanyol
* Joan Picanyol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 18:09]: > * Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 14:24]: > > - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than > > "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, doing a large dd to a > > file in NFS, varying the

Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-10-25 Thread Joan Picanyol
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 14:24]: > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > > Is there an response to the request? If not, that might suggest the > > > server is wedged, not the client. If you are willing to share the results > > > of a tcpdump -s 1500 -w output f

Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-10-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > Is there an response to the request? If not, that might suggest the > > server is wedged, not the client. If you are willing to share the results > > of a tcpdump -s 1500 -w output from a few seconds during the > > wedge, that would be very useful.

Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-10-25 Thread Joan Picanyol
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 10:42]: > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > [please honour Mail-Followup-To:, no need to keep the crosspost] > > Hmm. Don't see one of those, maybe it was trimmed by Mailman? Just checked, must have been. Maybe because it only had -

Re: process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-10-25 Thread Joan Picanyol
* Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 05:49]: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:20:08AM +0200, Joan Picanyol wrote: > > > This is driving me nuts, and I'm surely not the only one using GNOME > > over NFS, is anyone else seeing this? What exactly is going on? How can > > I fix it? It might be that t

process stuck in nfsfsync state

2004-10-24 Thread Joan Picanyol
[please honour Mail-Followup-To:, no need to keep the crosspost] This is a repost of http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041014110752.GA57541, with some additional information. I've updated the client to RC1, and the problem still persists. In short, a 5.3-RC1 client mounting /home off a 4.10-p3