* Jeremy Chadwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * I'm left questioning why a disk manufacturer would process drives
> (by this I mean the manufacturing process) differently based on their
> transport type. It would cost a *huge* amount of money to have
> separate fabs for SCSI, SAS, and SATA/PATA.
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> * Hard disks are growing in capacity, but are not growing in physical
> size. We're pushing 1TB in a 3.5" form factor. And the same applies to
> laptop (2.5") drives. The margin of error continues to increase as we
> try to cram more and more data in such a small med
At 08:44 PM 7/23/2007, Bill Swingle wrote:
After several tries I was able to get both disks newfs'd and mounted
but they quickly fell down with DMA timeouts. On one occasion the
machine actually panic'd too:
Hi,
What options do you have set in the BIOS for the sata
controller ? Do y
Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> * SCSI is outrageously expensive even in 2007. I have yet to see
>> any shred of justification for why SCSI costs so much *even today*.
>> It costs only a smidgen less than it did 15 years ago.
>>
>> * SCSI is on its way
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote..
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:30:49PM -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>>> I don't have any experience with the Hitachi 1TB SATA drives, but I
>>> know an outfit that was trying out the Seagate 1TB drives and had 8
>
Hi, all!
> To add fuel to the fire, Seagate *again* sent me a refurbished drive
> (and I used their advanced replacement program), which has sat in a box
> unopened since received. I ended up buying two WD 500GB drives to
> replace the single Seagate; one of the drives is used for nothing other
>
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> * SCSI is outrageously expensive even in 2007. I have yet to see
> any shred of justification for why SCSI costs so much *even today*.
> It costs only a smidgen less than it did 15 years ago.
>
> * SCSI is on its way out. Seagate recently anno
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote..
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:30:49PM -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > I don't have any experience with the Hitachi 1TB SATA drives, but I
> > know an outfit that was trying out the Seagate 1TB drives and had 8
> > out of 12 fail thei
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:30:49PM -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I don't have any experience with the Hitachi 1TB SATA drives, but I
> know an outfit that was trying out the Seagate 1TB drives and had 8
> out of 12 fail their burn-in (a 3 day torture test) My luck with
> consumer SATA drives has
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:40:21PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> > > Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
> > > Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
> >
> > Actually
Bill Swingle wrote:
> I have a fileserver that currently has a 4-disc raid connected to an
> IDE 3ware card. I had hoped to replace this dying system with a pair
> of synchronized 1TB SATA drives. When trying to newfs them both
> eventually failed with DMA READ or WRITE timeouts. Here's some infos
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:40:21PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> > Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
> > Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
>
> Actually you did include this in your original Email. I think Danie
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:40:21PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
> Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
Actually you did include this in your original Email. I think Daniel
overlooked it. :-)
After looking at your dmesg an
Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
Here's the controller info:
atapci1: port
0xec00-0xec07,0xe800-0xe803,0xe400-0xe407,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdc0f irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata2: on atapci1
ata3: on atapci1
-Bil
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Bill Swingle wrote:
> I've read that bad SATA cables could cause this, the cables I'm using
> are brand new but are probably pretty cheap.
Unlike they're both faulty too..
You need to post your dmesg otherwise we have no idea what controller
you're using..
--
Daniel O'Conn
Hello all,
I've run across a problem that I hope someone can aid me with.
I have a fileserver that currently has a 4-disc raid connected to an IDE 3ware card. I had hoped to
replace this dying system with a pair of synchronized 1TB SATA drives. When trying to newfs them
both eventually failed
16 matches
Mail list logo
