On Monday 24 November 2003 17:35, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> given that VJ Header compression also does not play well with FreeBSD's
> I am leaning to the ERX.
Right, vjcomp, I don't need to disable that here as well...
> Back to the original question of how best to work around this. I will be
> deplo
At 11:25 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> And for
> sure its an ERX on the other end ?
Actually it's an NRP - it seems Cisco does a better job with their PPPoE
implementation.
OK, thanks. The problem I see is only against an ERX. So either
misconfigured ERX or something about Juniper's
On Monday 24 November 2003 17:07, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 10:59 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its
> > > actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the l
At 10:59 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its
> actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do
> you see
> tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR e
On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its
> actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do
> you see
> tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 10.00 secs
> or do you see
> tun0: LQM: defli
Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its
actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do
you see
tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 10.00 secs
or do you see
tun0: LQM: deflink: LQR/ECHO LQR not negotiated
What do you have for your ppp.
On Monday 24 November 2003 15:32, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> The problem is that LQR is agreed to with the ERX (the PPPoE terminating
> device on the other end), but it never works.
Works for me. I guess there really are many providers with misconfigured
equipment out there. Actually, I know people wh
Hi,
Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait :
>
>>Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection.
>
>>I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after
>>the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1.
>
> This is probably a coincidence.
Not really. T
At 09:56 AM 10/1/2002 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
>Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait :
>
> > Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection.
>
> > I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after
> > the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1.
>
>This is probably a co
Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait :
> Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection.
> I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after
> the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1.
This is probably a coincidence. I saw that when France Telecom changed
some ADSL e
10 matches
Mail list logo
