Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

2019-03-06 Thread Paul Mather
On Mar 6, 2019, at 3:58 PM, tech-lists wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:23:49PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: >>> Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : > >>> Basically I'm looking for exclude mask functionality when updating a >>> ports tree with poudriere ports. >>> >>> Do I need to do

Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

2019-03-06 Thread tech-lists
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:23:49PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : Basically I'm looking for exclude mask functionality when updating a ports tree with poudriere ports. Do I need to do this manually or have I missed something? I don’t think it’s easy

Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

2019-03-06 Thread Stefan Bethke
> Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : > > Hi, > > There are several categories of ports I'd like to avoid for some > architectures. For example, I don't want x11 for mips.mips64. Or astronomy. > But let's say, for this architecture, I want to build everything else. > > I can't see a w

poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

2019-03-05 Thread tech-lists
Hi, There are several categories of ports I'd like to avoid for some architectures. For example, I don't want x11 for mips.mips64. Or astronomy. But let's say, for this architecture, I want to build everything else. I can't see a way of excluding categories with poudriere ports when updating