On 29/12/2007, Dave Overton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed.
>
> For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me.
>
> Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't
> http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially since the author of
> portsnap su
Subject: portaudit and portsnap acting silly.
>
> Portaudit does this:
> # portaudit -Fa
> auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB
> 6001 kBps
> portaudit: Database too old.
> Old database restored.
> portaudit: Download failed.
>
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:22:18AM -0800, Dave Overton wrote:
> Portaudit does this:
> # portaudit -Fa
> auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps
> portaudit: Database too old.
> Old database restored.
> portaudit: Download failed.
>
>
> Portsnap does this:
> #
Portaudit does this:
# portaudit -Fa
auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps
portaudit: Database too old.
Old database restored.
portaudit: Download failed.
Portsnap does this:
# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
Fetchi
