Re: portaudit and portsnap acting silly.

2007-12-29 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 29/12/2007, Dave Overton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fixed. > > For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me. > > Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't > http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially s

RE: portaudit and portsnap acting silly.

2007-12-28 Thread Dave Overton
Fixed. For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me. Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially since the author of portsnap suggests a cache server for speed Oh well... Dave Ov

Re: portaudit and portsnap acting silly.

2007-12-27 Thread Guido Falsi
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:22:18AM -0800, Dave Overton wrote: > Portaudit does this: > # portaudit -Fa > auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps > portaudit: Database too old. > Old database restored. > portaudit: Download failed. > >

portaudit and portsnap acting silly.

2007-12-27 Thread Dave Overton
Portaudit does this: # portaudit -Fa auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps portaudit: Database too old. Old database restored. portaudit: Download failed. Portsnap does this: # portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found

Re: portaudit

2007-08-28 Thread gareth
On Mon 2007-08-27 (17:09), Chuck Swiger wrote: > This might imply that your system clock on that machine is wrong...? > Double-check what it thinks is the date. date and time is synced. > Also, make sure you don't have some old version stuck in an intervening > proxy, if such is being used. i

Re: portaudit

2007-08-27 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Aug 27, 2007, at 1:08 PM, gareth wrote: hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem. this's what happens: # portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045 kBps

portaudit

2007-08-27 Thread gareth
hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem. this's what happens: # portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045 kBps portaudit: Database too old. Old database restored.

Re: Portaudit

2007-03-05 Thread Sergey N. Voronkov
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess

Re: Portaudit

2007-03-05 Thread Randy Pratt
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:50 +0100 "Stephane Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows

Re: Portaudit

2007-03-05 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
Stephane Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore > because of > three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if > there are knows vulnerabilities ? After 'man 7

Portaudit

2007-03-05 Thread Stephane Thomas
Hello, I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudit_fixed= lines in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf but as the

Re: portaudit

2006-10-23 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Yoshihiro Ota wrote: [...] Hello. What are other ways? I want to see vulnerable message but still want to install without portupgrade being interrupted. According to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes disables vulnerable check, don't it? Yes, it disable vulnerability check

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread Yoshihiro Ota
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:03:55 +0200 Miroslav Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gareth wrote: > > There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough. Hello. What are other ways? I want to see vulnerable message but still want to insta

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (19:33), Ronald Klop wrote: > You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment. > In bash it is: > export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true thanx ;) > But know what you are doing. I do not recommend you to install vulnerable > ports. yes i don't feel to easy about it, m

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (20:03), Miroslav Lachman wrote: > There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough. thanx, that did the trick. > Permissions denied may be caused by your file system mount options - if > you have /var (/var/db/pkg)

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:10:44 +0200, gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it "has known vulnerabilities". You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment. In bash it is: export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread Miroslav Lachman
gareth wrote: hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it "has known vulnerabilities". trying to tell it it's ok with 'portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf doesn't work, and trying to deinstall portaudit: /usr/ports

portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it "has known vulnerabilities". trying to tell it it's ok with 'portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf doesn't work, and trying to deinstall portaudit: /usr/ports/security/portaudit# ma