On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:14:42AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:28:55 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> >
> >>Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
> >>io
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:19:02 +0900, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > time(minutes) * speed(MHz) * nproc / 1000 MHz
Looking at your examples, it seems you divide by 1e5, not by 1000. In
other words, buildworld is CPU bound and takes about 6e12 clock
cycles. Use -j.
Nick B
___
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:28:55 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
io bound?
I can't test this myself, because my laptop is to slow for making these
tes
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
> io bound?
> I can't test this myself, because my laptop is to slow for making these
> tests any fun.
Based on my tests, 'make index' is only faster with -j
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:19:02 +0900, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob wrote:
Brian Szymanski wrote:
Did you try any machines that used Hyperthreading? I'd be interested to
see how those machines fare based on the number of logical and real
CPUs.
Although people suggest "-j4" as optimal in gene
