This patch works for me.
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Li, Qing wrote:
Please find the more proper fix at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/nd6-patch.diff
I realized I was slightly off in my previous email after
I spent a bit more time looking through the problem.
Both prefixes are present
f Li, Qing
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:46 PM
>> To: Tom Pusateri
>> Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>> Subject: RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
>>
>> Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table dump
>>
ebsd-
> sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: Tom Pusateri
> Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
>
> Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table du
gt; Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
>
> I didn't think this routing patch was related to the "bad neighbor
> solicitation messages" as suggested in the subject field but I tried
it
> anyway. It d
I didn't think this routing patch was related to the "bad neighbor solicitation
messages" as suggested in the subject field but I tried it anyway. It does not
fix my IPv6 problem. I still get "bad neighbor solicitation messages" and
freebsd 8 doesn't respond to 4/5 IPv6 pings.
Thanks,
Tom
On D
Please find the more proper fix at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/nd6-patch.diff
I realized I was slightly off in my previous email after
I spent a bit more time looking through the problem.
Both prefixes are present but one was marked off-link due
to the fact only a single prefix rou
