Re: panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf8000 is not in any segment

2009-09-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:00:26AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:09:55PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) -- > > > each of which is i3

Re: panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf8000 is not in any segment

2009-09-06 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:09:55PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) -- > > each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to > > r196827 (from Thursda

Re: panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf8000 is not in any segment

2009-09-06 Thread A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
David Wolfskill wrote: > It appears to be happening when xdm(1) gets started. I'm getting the same when starting X manually (startx). > I welcome clues. A patch has been submitted to this list less than an hour ago and I've already seen the SVN commit as well. I'm currently rebuilding, you migh

Re: panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf8000 is not in any segment

2009-09-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) -- > each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to > r196827 (from Thursday), then rebuilding stable/7 at r196886, it > recurred. Please try r19689

panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf8000 is not in any segment

2009-09-06 Thread David Wolfskill
First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) -- each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to r196827 (from Thursday), then rebuilding stable/7 at r196886, it recurred. It appears to be happening when xdm(1) gets started., which is pretty late in the transit