Hi Gavin,
sorry, took some time to test it, but we're currently very busy moving
services to the new machines.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:06:38PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Sorry - even with that patch, I suspect you'll have to either run top with
> the -u option, or define RANDOM_PW before
On 4/27/05, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while back, there was talk of a FreeBSD libc name cache daemon, but I
> can't seem to find any reference to it now (I seem to remember the
> website was within .ru, if it helps anyone find it) - though I'm not
> sure it would help in this co
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 12:59 +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> > The more accounts there are in the LDAP directory, the longer the
> > startup of "top" takes. With the current userbase top takes about 3-4
> > seconds to start (on a mostly idle Dual Xeon
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 12:59 +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some servers running running on 5.4-STABLE as of Apr 5th. I use
> nss_ldap for a userbase of currently about 24000 accounts (will be
> growing to approx 6 in the next weeks). I don't use pam_ldap
> currently, bec
Hi.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 07:55:37AM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
> > Any ideas, why this is happening? Will I need 10 seconds, when there are
> > 6 accounts in LDAP? :-)
>
> Have you set your indexes correctly? This may result in a huge speedup.
> I use (this is only for about 180 accounts
Hi,
> Any ideas, why this is happening? Will I need 10 seconds, when there are
> 6 accounts in LDAP? :-)
Have you set your indexes correctly? This may result in a huge speedup.
I use (this is only for about 180 accounts, but NSS works instantly):
# Indices to maintain
index object
Hello.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:00:23PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> You can benchmark top by running "time top -d1", which will print one
> page then immediately exit.
Well, it makes really no difference, if I call top with -u or not.
> > Any ideas, why this is happening? Will I need 10 seconds
In the last episode (Apr 25), Oliver Brandmueller said:
> I have some servers running running on 5.4-STABLE as of Apr 5th. I
> use nss_ldap for a userbase of currently about 24000 accounts (will
> be growing to approx 6 in the next weeks). I don't use pam_ldap
> currently, because users only ne
Hi,
I have some servers running running on 5.4-STABLE as of Apr 5th. I use
nss_ldap for a userbase of currently about 24000 accounts (will be
growing to approx 6 in the next weeks). I don't use pam_ldap
currently, because users only need to login by IMAP, POP, SMTP and FTP,
for all of thes
