Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2008-08-28 Thread Jos Backus
Fyi: after applying r180753 ("Only enable MSI mappings for devices that use MSI. Fixes interrupt loss on some nForce based boards.") using polling with nfe is no longer needed to avoid choppy audio playback. Thanks for the fix. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com __

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-30 Thread Jos Backus
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:53:43AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:16:18AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: [snip] > > Both pcm0 and nfe0 are mobo devices. Is there any way to change the > assigned > > interrupts? > > > > It seems that your NIC doesn't have MSI/MSIX capabili

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-29 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:16:18AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 02:02:40PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:21:47PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > ATM nfe(4)

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-29 Thread Jos Backus
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 02:02:40PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:21:47PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > [snip] > > > ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work > > > at all so nfe

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:21:47PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > [snip] > > ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work > > at all so nfe(4) generates too many interrupts. However I don't > > think it wouldn't

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 04:07:33AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > Will let you know results thanks, also will polling work on my card? > Yes. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Chris
On 29/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Jos Backus
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:28:01AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: [snip] > ATM nfe(4)'s interrupt moderation mechanism doesn't seem to work > at all so nfe(4) generates too many interrupts. However I don't > think it wouldn't be major bottleneck of the performance. Could this be why (on -current) I

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris w

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-28 Thread Chris
On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > The card is more stable when using

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-27 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote: [...] > > > > > The card is more stable when using nve driver no crashes still but the > > > performance is around the

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-27 Thread Chris
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > > options=

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-27 Thread Chris
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:17:40PM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > > options=

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-26 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=8 > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-26 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:17:40PM +0100, Chris wrote: > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=8 > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-24 Thread Chris
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=8 > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0x broadcast x.x.x.x > >

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-24 Thread Chris
On 24/09/2007, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=8 > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > > >

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-24 Thread Chris
On 24/09/2007, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > > options=8 > > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > > >

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-24 Thread Chris
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > options=8 > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0x broadcast x.x.x.x > >

Re: nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote: > nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x > inet x.x.x.x netmask 0x broadcast x.x.x.x > ether x > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) >

nfe driver 6.2 stable

2007-09-23 Thread Chris
Hi I installed the following driver. http://www.f.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki//software/freebsd-nfe.html Before I had the nve driver which was unstable on this server and on a prior server in both cases causing either spontaneous reboot or just a crash when under load. So far touchwood the nfe