Re: new LORs on 10-STABLE

2015-12-30 Thread Florian Ermisch
On 30.12.15 01:59, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 12/30/15, Florian Ermisch > wrote: >> [...] Am 30. Dezember 2015 01:26:00 MEZ, schrieb Oliver Pinter >> : >>> Hi All! >>> >>> I get these new LORs with a recent 10-STABLE (~10-stable from >>> today) branch: [...] Oliver, you may want to look at bug 2

Re: new LORs on 10-STABLE

2015-12-29 Thread Oliver Pinter
On 12/30/15, Florian Ermisch wrote: > Quoting asomers@ on the current list: > "Adding Will@. I think he was working on this LOR at one point" > > No idea what a LOR (Lock Order R…?) is (yet) but might have R as reversal, see the first line of your log :) > the same cause as the issue I've posted

Re: new LORs on 10-STABLE

2015-12-29 Thread Florian Ermisch
Quoting asomers@ on the current list: "Adding Will@. I think he was working on this LOR at one point" No idea what a LOR (Lock Order R…?) is (yet) but might have the same cause as the issue I've posted on the current list earlier today*. Regards, Florian *) my trace can also be found under https

new LORs on 10-STABLE

2015-12-29 Thread Oliver Pinter
Hi All! I get these new LORs with a recent 10-STABLE (~10-stable from today) branch: LOR1: [12] lock order reversal: [12] 1st 0xf8000d1ea7c8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1224 [12] 2nd 0xf8000d1eb240 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2192 [12] KDB: stack backtrac