On Fri, 25 May 2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in the
process of releasing a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant difference
in thruput between the 2 versions in a contro
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:05:15AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
> the process of releasing
> a new version based on 6.1 stable.
>
> In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
> differenc
Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
> the process of releasing
> a new version based on 6.1 stable.
>
> In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
> difference in thruput between the 2
> versions in a con
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 03:17:40PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > Why are you releasing a new product on an already unsupported version?
> > 6.2 is the version you really need to be moving to not 6.1.
>
> FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported
Stephen Clark wrote:
> The appliance is basically a firewall/nat/vpn device. We started on 6.1
> last year and it has
> taken us a while to get things tested, plus I don't like to use a brand
> new release. If we go to
> a later release it means we have to do complete regression testing, etc
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:05, Stephen Clark wrote:
> We have a person that is testing the both system inhouse surfing out
> over the internet on our T1 link and he complains that he is consistently
seeing the 6.1 version being much slower than the
> 4.9 version (on the same hardware).
FreeBSD cann
Dominic Marks wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason behind not running a more rece
- Original Message -
From: "Gavin Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported - far from it. When 6.1 was released, it
was designated as an "Extended support" branch, and is currently
scheduled to be supported (from a security point of view) after support
for 6.2 is drop
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One of our testers has the same setup but is using winblows/ie in place of
freebsd+firefox and subjectively says the 6.1 system is slower than the
4.9 system.
I was just wandering if there were any tunables that might cause
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
[..]
> >>He has been comparing the 6.1 system to 4.9 system for a couple of weeks
> >>and continues to insist the 6.1 version is much slower.
[..]
> In subjective tests R&D has done using the following setup we see "no"
> problem:
>
> freebsd+firefo
Stephen Clark wrote:
> Dominic Marks wrote:
>
>> Stephen Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>> We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
>>> the process of releasing
>>> a new version based on 6.1 stable.
>>>
>>
>> You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Why are you releasing a new product on an already unsupported version?
> 6.2 is the version you really need to be moving to not 6.1.
FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported - far from it. When 6.1 was released, it
was designated as an "Extended s
7 1:05 PM
Subject: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput be
Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
> the process of releasing
> a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason behind not running a more recent STABLE? I understand
d
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled environment - aproximately 94mbs on a 100
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled environment - aproximate
16 matches
Mail list logo
