Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [20001104 11:35], Larry Rosenman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Paging a committer... Best way is to directly place one in the to: and/or cc: line. I don't have time every day to skim through every message on every list I am on. >Can this get into 4.2??? I'll look into it. -- Jeroen Rui

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
Paging a committer... Can this get into 4.2??? Larry * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 15:38]: > > The following is awaiting commit to 8.2.3 > > Mark > > Index: src/CHANGES > === > RCS file: /proj/cvs

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin
At 11:54 AM 11/3/00 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: --hedge trimmer-- > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Larry > Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > > > > > > > > > > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > US Mail: 1905 Steamb

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Bap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 11:14]: > Should there only be one A recored per IP address, so that the reverse matches it? > > If you want to alias ns-a to lerami you should > ns-a IN CNAME lerami.lerctr.org. NO, you can't have NS records pointing to A's. And both are in the reverse

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Bap
Should there only be one A recored per IP address, so that the reverse matches it? If you want to alias ns-a to lerami you should ns-aIN CNAME lerami.lerctr.org. > No, there is another A record for ns-a. > > > > * Bap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 10:57]: > > Shouln't you have > >

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
No, there is another A record for ns-a. * Bap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 10:57]: > Shouln't you have > IN NS lerami.lerctr.org. > if it is SOA? > > Bap. > > > Looks like it just took 20+minutes, and not on the notify: > > Nov 3 09:31:52 lerami named[828]: master zone "lerct

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Bap
Shouln't you have IN NS lerami.lerctr.org. if it is SOA? Bap. > Looks like it just took 20+minutes, and not on the notify: > Nov 3 09:31:52 lerami named[828]: master zone "lerctr.org" (IN) > loaded (serial > 2000110302) > Nov 3 09:32:00 lerami named[828]: Sent NOTIFY for "le

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 08:17]: > > > ok, but it didn't seem to hear the notify from 207.158.72.11 (same > > net) and load it. (8.2.2-P5 on UnixWare 7). All the others > > (all 4 other 2ndary's). > > All the log shows is named starting/reloading. Ok, I upped the

Re: named weirdness...

2000-11-03 Thread Mark . Andrews
Because a NOTIFY is supposed to be sent whenever a master, not just the primary master, loads a new copy of a zone. This allows "master -> slave -> slave" to work out of the box. Mark > Why is OUR named sending notify's for a SECONDARY zone? > > lerbsd# tail /va