On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > 1) "mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" never released the tty
> > 2) "nohup mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" did release the tty
> What happens if you run the following command?
> daemon -cf mysqld_safe
On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The diff is pretty obvious/simple (2 line change), so the other
> databases/mysqlXX-server ports can be upgraded in the same manner.
>
> --- files/mysql-server.sh.in.orig 2010-03-27 03:24:53.0 -0700
> +++ files/mysql-server.sh.in
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:53:07AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > The diff is pretty obvious/simple (2 line change), so the other
> > databases/mysqlXX-server ports can be upgraded in the same manner.
> >
> > --- files/mysql-server.sh.in.orig
Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
> Until rc(8) can be updated to support daemon(8) natively,
This would be the Right Thing IMHO.
> the ~76 ports
> which Do The Wrong Thing(tm) should get updated to do it this way. Ones
> like mysqlXX-server should be placed high on the priority list given
> their pop
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick ha scritto:
> > Until rc(8) can be updated to support daemon(8) natively,
>
> This would be the Right Thing IMHO.
>
> > the ~76 ports
> > which Do The Wrong Thing(tm) should get updated to do it this way. Ones
> > like
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> * Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > 1) "mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" never released the tty
> > 2) "nohup mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" did release the tty
>
> What happens if you run the following command?
>
> da
Hi Jeremy,
* Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> 1) "mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" never released the tty
> 2) "nohup mysqld_safe > /dev/null 2>&1 &" did release the tty
What happens if you run the following command?
daemon -cf mysqld_safe
The point is that FreeBSD's pts(4) driver only dealloca
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> Something interesting I've come across which happens on both RELENG_7
> and RELENG_8 (indicating it's not a problem with the older tty code or
> the newer pty/pts code), and it's reproducible on Linux (sort of...).
>
> mysqld_safe appears t
Something interesting I've come across which happens on both RELENG_7
and RELENG_8 (indicating it's not a problem with the older tty code or
the newer pty/pts code), and it's reproducible on Linux (sort of...).
mysqld_safe appears to hold a pty/tty open even after the process has
been backgrounded
