Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-16 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:49, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > I had a quick look at what has happened to the capture code in > mplayer since I last saw it (and felt a bit ill). It seems that it pretty > much depends on the frame sync signals from the bktr device with a fallback > one second alarm. I

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-16 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:04:48 +1030 "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first is that when you force it to capture audio (so mute and volume > control work, or you can use mencoder) it does about 0.25 fps :( It doesn't > appear to be using heaps of CPU or anything so I am not sure

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-15 Thread Stephen Hurd
Daniel O'Connor wrote: FreeBSD doesn't have rtc.ko.. Mine doesn't anyway :) I'm not sure how mplayer in FreeBSD stamps frames either. It's not stock, but /dev/rtc (via rtc.ko) can be had via emulators/rtc if rtc.ko exists, it's a dependency, to force it to be built you can frob the WITH_RT

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-15 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:51, Danny Pansters wrote: > I myself am not really doing anything with capturing, but some ideas that > may be helpful: > > FWIW, from what I know in ring capture mode the video gets synch'd by the > audio by having enough frames per audio sample. So if audio sample size or >

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Danny Pansters
On Monday 14 November 2005 01:02, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:13, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > > If you add immediatemode=0 to the tv args it will do it. > > > > I've just tried that and the speed drops to something like 5-6 fps. > > Interesting problem. > > Yeah, I suspect there is

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:13, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > If you add immediatemode=0 to the tv args it will do it. > > I've just tried that and the speed drops to something like 5-6 fps. > Interesting problem. Yeah, I suspect there is something wrong with the audio sampling, but I haven't looked at it

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi there, On 11/13/05, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:00, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > > The first is that when you force it to capture audio (so mute and volume > > > control work, or you can use mencoder) it does about 0.25 fps :( It > > > doesn't appear to be us

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:00, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > The first is that when you force it to capture audio (so mute and volume > > control work, or you can use mencoder) it does about 0.25 fps :( It > > doesn't appear to be using heaps of CPU or anything so I am not sure what > > the problem is. > >

Re: mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hi there, > The first is that when you force it to capture audio (so mute and volume > control work, or you can use mencoder) it does about 0.25 fps :( It doesn't > appear to be using heaps of CPU or anything so I am not sure what the problem > is. I haven't tried this yet but can give it a go.

mplayer + bktr

2005-11-13 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Hi, I'm trying to use mplayer to watch TV and while it does work it has a few problems. The first is that when you force it to capture audio (so mute and volume control work, or you can use mencoder) it does about 0.25 fps :( It doesn't appear to be using heaps of CPU or anything so I am not su