schrieb Mateusz Guzik am 15.02.2013 17:50 (localtime):
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
>> umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
>> After jail has been destroyed, the following m
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
> umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
> After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
> /dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on /.jail.ja
Hello,
while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
/dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on /.jail.jailname1 (ufs, local, read-only)
There was var mounted to /.jail.jailname1/var bu