re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-02-01 Thread Chris
-- Forwarded message -- From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 + Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug To: Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented out) is auto. Or at le

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-02-01 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +, Chris wrote: > Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance > difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and > its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% > worse then if left on auto or

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-02-01 Thread Chris
Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is any specific types of te

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-31 Thread Bosko Milekic
Can you please give an update? -Bosko On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:43:10PM +, Chris wrote: > I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as > soon as possible by the end of the weekend. > > Chris > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0500, Bosko Milekic > <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-21 Thread Chris
I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as soon as possible by the end of the weekend. Chris On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0500, Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you please give an update? > > -Bosko > > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +, Chris

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-21 Thread Bosko Milekic
Can you please give an update? -Bosko On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:43:53PM +, Chris wrote: > thanks I will try this out as soon as possible and report back. > > > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:38:54 -0500, Bosko Milekic > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please try the attached patch. It's not e

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-08 Thread Chris
thanks I will try this out as soon as possible and report back. On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:38:54 -0500, Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please try the attached patch. It's not exactly perfect but it might > solve your problem. Let me know. > > -Bosko > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:12

Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-06 Thread Bosko Milekic
Please try the attached patch. It's not exactly perfect but it might solve your problem. Let me know. -Bosko On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:12:33PM +, Chris wrote: > Hi > > After reading the release notes and upgrading my server's I had set > the following in my /boot/loader.conf. > > kern.i

mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug

2005-01-06 Thread Chris
Hi After reading the release notes and upgrading my server's I had set the following in my /boot/loader.conf. kern.ipc.nmbclusters="0" This is supposed to make the limit to unlimited as I understood from the docs, but a user on one of my server's reported slow download speeds he was testing with