Re: mail.local permissions

2000-11-06 Thread Jussi Reissell
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was referring to the FreeBSD release notes (see below). But the > mail.local information is in the sendmail release notes as well: > > MAIL.LOCAL: Will not be installed setuid root. To use mail.local > as local delivery a

Re: mail.local permissions

2000-11-05 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
reissell> Ok, thanks. But would you believe, I *did* read the release notes reissell> I'm aware of: /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/RELEASE_NOTES. The above reissell> snippet isn't in that file. I was referring to the FreeBSD release notes (see below). But the mail.local information is in the sendmail

Re: mail.local permissions

2000-11-05 Thread Pilli
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > reissell> Just cvsup'ed to 4.2-BETA and sendmail's local mailer refused to > reissell> play ball. After a little hair-pulling I noticed the permissions > reissell> of /usr/libexec/mail.local lacked the setuid bit. Mail.local > reissell> would ret