Re: Moz on FreeBSD [was: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7]

2001-11-27 Thread Rasputin
* Michael Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011126 01:05]: > > > Jochem Kossen wrote: > > > > > As for java...does THAT work with mozilla on FreeBSD? HOW? :) > > > > The FreeBSD Java team is working on that right now, over on the FreeBSD Java list. >Latest news is that the native 1.3 JDK is comp

OpenOffice for FreeBSD [was Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7]

2001-11-26 Thread Chad R. Larson
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Tom Fischer wrote: >> I installed staroffice 6 with the ports mechanism, and I had the >> same problem with the dialog boxes not appearing. I was running >> afterstep 1.8.9 as my wm (XFree86 4.1.0). When I switched to twm, >> the dialog box problem wen

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-26 Thread Devon Ryan
Sergey Solyanik wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:06:53AM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > > >>Linux browser + Linux plugin = YES >>Native browser + Linux plugin = NO >>(or as you said _magic_) :-) >> > > Can't find it now in my mail archive, but it's definitely not > fairy tale, it's true.

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-26 Thread Sergey Solyanik
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:06:53AM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > Linux browser + Linux plugin = YES > Native browser + Linux plugin = NO > (or as you said _magic_) :-) Can't find it now in my mail archive, but it's definitely not fairy tale, it's true. There is a port or something on sourcef

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-25 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:46:11PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:00:46PM -0500, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > > ... > > Finally this might not save you the burden of using linuxbase since most > > of the plugins (flash 5.0, realplayer 8.0) are available for Linux but > > not

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-25 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:44:38AM +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote: > This is REALLY getting off-topic, and i did NOT want to start some kind > of browser-flamewar... > Agreed. -- Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-25 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:32AM +, P. U. (Uli) Kruppa wrote: > > > > ... Most people just say "it doesn't work, linux_base-7 > > sucks". The reality is that linux_base-6 will go away because we are > > phasing in linux_base7 so we have to fix what we can to make the ports work > > with i

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-23 Thread Bruce Burden
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:19:47AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > You can fix this as follows. Start netscape - see that it has an error > message about not finding > libstd++ > where is something. Look in /compat/linux/usr/lib. There you see > libstd++ > So do > ln -

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Bruce Burden wrote: > > I think Netscape 4 is compiled with the Linux 6 libraries. > I installed Linux base 7 on a clean system, and Netscape install > went out and tried to install Linux base 6. It could not find a > particular library, which was there, just under a different

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-23 Thread Dinesh Nair
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Bruce Burden wrote: > Oh, and trying to install Linux base 7 on top of Linux base > 6 resulted in a lot of "lib* conflicts with lib*..." messages. that is what i am afraid of. shucks. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROT

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-23 Thread Bruce Burden
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 02:53:35PM +0200, Nimrod Mesika wrote: > > I tried moving to Linux_base-7 to be able to run a precompiled > binary of galeon. Not only did galeon not run, but I haven't been > able to make any version of linux netscape work with Linux base 7. > Settled for a natively compil

Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7

2001-11-23 Thread Nimrod Mesika
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > hey, > > have linux-base 6.2 installed and working fine for a bunch of linux > binaries including staroffice 5.2 and netscape-linux, both from the ports > collection. planning on trying out staroffice 6.0-beta, but it depends on >