On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 12:24:53PM -0800, Duane H. Hesser wrote:
> A few still have 'local' hardwired in, but after many years of
...
> The X11 situation is not quite as rosy; there have been quite a
> few which needed hand patching. The problem seems to be a lot of
> Imakefiles with BINDIR, INC
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:34:23PM -0800, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Except, of course, that /usr/local/lib *does* get special treatment!
> It's listed in ldconfig_paths (and the aout subdir
> ldconfig_paths_aout), along with /usr/X11R6/lib &
> /usr/lib/compat. None of those are part of the OS, though al
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 03:14:04PM -0800, Mike Meyer wrote:
> ;->It belongs in /usr/local.
>
> I don't agree. Things being maintainted and supported locally belong
> in /usr/local. Ports and packages come on the distribution, and you go
> back to the same channels for support as you do for core p
Mike and Paul
I agree with both of you (at least conceptually), regarding
installation locations of software (the topic here has wandered a
bit from the original Subject: line). I think your positions are
not so far apart, differing only in detail. It is certainly (in
my view) useful to keep op
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, mleczo wrote:
> Helo
> Im new to all of this
> But got one question
> I cant compile eggdrop on my FreeBSD 2.2.8
> When it comes to linking i got an error
> ld: -ltcl no match
>
> Wheres the problem
> PLease help me solve this
>
> bye
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send ma
John Baldwin writes:
;->> The bottom line is that taking the name people have standardized on
;->> for installing *local* packages and installing system-provided
;->> packages there is a bad thing(TM). None of the solutions I used
;->> suffered from that flaw.
;->Umm, if the name /usr/local distur
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, mleczo wrote:
> Helo
> Im new to all of this
> But got one question
> I cant compile eggdrop on my FreeBSD 2.2.8
> When it comes to linking i got an error
> ld: -ltcl no match
>
> Wheres the problem
> PLease help me solve this
This would have been better suited for -questio
On 11-Nov-99 Mike Meyer wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
> ;->On 11-Nov-99 Mike Meyer wrote:
> ;->> I still curse at regular intervals at the ports/packages
> collection
> ;->> installing things in /usr/local. That means I need another place
> for
> ;->> things that I maintain, instead of came with
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Scott Benjamin wrote:
>
> I've installed some libs on my machine (3.3-STABLE 11-09-1999) in
> /usr/local/lib, via ports and some tarballs. I have let ldconfig_path in
> rc.conf. When I do a ldconfig -r -v -elf | grep libname, it finds the
> correct library. but when I try
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Scott Benjamin wrote:
>
> I've installed some libs on my machine (3.3-STABLE 11-09-1999) in
> /usr/local/lib, via ports and some tarballs. I have let ldconfig_path in
> rc.conf. When I do a ldconfig -r -v -elf | grep libname, it finds the
> correct library. but when I try
10 matches
Mail list logo
