22.10.2018 21:35, Glen Barber wrote:
>> This is just a typical foot-shooting (and a shortcoming of the kernel build
>> system that allows such foot-shooting to happen).
>> I think that there can be other ways in which you can specify inconsistent
>> kernel options and/or an incorrect subset of mod
On 22/10/2018 17:32, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 22.10.2018 21:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> This is just a typical foot-shooting (and a shortcoming of the kernel build
>> system that allows such foot-shooting to happen).
>> I think that there can be other ways in which you can specify inconsistent
>> ke
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 05:21:43PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 22/10/2018 17:15, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:09:14PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >> 22.10.2018 21:03, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>
> >> t's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
> > I see that zfs has
22.10.2018 21:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Glen, maybe that errata record should be deleted. The problem is real but
> it is long-standing
> and present in 10.x too.
>
Could you elaborate more on the failure case you originally reported
first? If the problem is real,
On 22/10/2018 17:15, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:09:14PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 22.10.2018 21:03, Glen Barber wrote:
>>
>> t's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
> I see that zfs has the krpc dependency since r193128.
> And the call to xdrmem_create is
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:09:14PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 22.10.2018 21:03, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> t's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
> >>> I see that zfs has the krpc dependency since r193128.
> >>> And the call to xdrmem_create is there since r168404.
> >>
> >> You are right
22.10.2018 21:03, Glen Barber wrote:
t's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
>>> I see that zfs has the krpc dependency since r193128.
>>> And the call to xdrmem_create is there since r168404.
>>
>> You are right. I was mis-informed and have not verified enough a report from
>> local user.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:59:10PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 19.10.2018 21:34, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > It's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
> > I see that zfs has the krpc dependency since r193128.
> > And the call to xdrmem_create is there since r168404.
>
> You are right. I w
19.10.2018 21:34, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> It's strange that this is a 10.x vs 11.x issue.
> I see that zfs has the krpc dependency since r193128.
> And the call to xdrmem_create is there since r168404.
You are right. I was mis-informed and have not verified enough a report from
local user.
Glen,
On 19/10/2018 12:24, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 19.10.2018 13:28, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>>> It was brought to my attention that 10.x did not require availability
>>> of krpc for ZFS-on-root system to be bootable but 11.x does.
>>>
>>> That is, major upgrade of 10.x ZFS-on-root system to 11.x
>>>
On 19.10.2018 13:28, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> It was brought to my attention that 10.x did not require availability
>> of krpc for ZFS-on-root system to be bootable but 11.x does.
>>
>> That is, major upgrade of 10.x ZFS-on-root system to 11.x
>> results in non-bootable broken system if it uses cust
On 18/10/2018 20:14, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It was brought to my attention that 10.x did not require availability
> of krpc for ZFS-on-root system to be bootable but 11.x does.
>
> That is, major upgrade of 10.x ZFS-on-root system to 11.x
> results in non-bootable broken system if it us
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:14:04AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It was brought to my attention that 10.x did not require availability
> of krpc for ZFS-on-root system to be bootable but 11.x does.
>
> That is, major upgrade of 10.x ZFS-on-root system to 11.x
> results in non-bootable b
Hi!
It was brought to my attention that 10.x did not require availability
of krpc for ZFS-on-root system to be bootable but 11.x does.
That is, major upgrade of 10.x ZFS-on-root system to 11.x
results in non-bootable broken system if it uses custom kernel without NFS bits
that automatically come
14 matches
Mail list logo
