Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-17 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > R Joseph Wright wrote: > > > > Since when? Any that I've ever needed had to be compiled into the > > kernel. > > Since when is a tough question, but since 4.0, I think, for NICs, and > certainly at least 3.x, maybe even 2.x, for fs. cvs log ifc

Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Coleman Kane
Sorry, been working a strange schedule this week. By resources, I meant kernel resources such as kmem space, from what I have been hearing though, it seems as though the kernel does a lot this stuff already. I dunno, but someone else posted awhile back about this, so I was still interested. Mike

Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Coleman Kane
No, they are technically shareable, as long as you don't attept to expect either of them at the software level to respond at a certain time. This is why you can have COM2 and COM4 on the same interrupt in windows or DOS, as long as you don't use them at the same time. The ISA bus is a very simple

Re: kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-05 Thread Mike Smith
> * Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000605 16:58] wrote: > > > > > Well, it would be nice to auto-load or unload any module that is needed. > > > not just ethernet and fs types. That's basically the idea. Say, if you > > > load a driver that uses some resources that another one can use while the

kerneld for FreeBSD

2000-06-04 Thread Coleman Kane
Would the person or person(s) interested in developing a kerneld-like, dynamic module (un)loader for FreeBSD please email me. I am really interested in this. It would be very advantageous to begin to move kld module use into the mainstream for all components. I'd like to do what I can to help with