Re: ipfilter problem

2002-05-06 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Jens Rehsack([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.06 15:04:14 +: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S/SA keep state > > # we want state added when establishing a > > # session, not for every t

Re: ipfilter problem

2002-05-05 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Jens Rehsack([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.06 00:46:58 +: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > > > Michael Riexinger([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +: > > > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the r

Re: ipfilter problem

2002-05-05 Thread Jens Rehsack
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > Michael Riexinger([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +: > > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the rest of > > > the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on a

Re: IPFilter problem on current cvs

2001-08-26 Thread Darren Reed
All rules like this: pass out quick on * proto tcp from any to any keep state should have a "flags S" in them. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message