On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:59:37PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 13:02, Clifton Royston wrote:
> > ipf does have the ability to more correctly simulate a closed port.
> > I did a similar exercise on my personal OpenBSD firewall box earlier
> > this year; I won't go through
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 13:02, Clifton Royston wrote:
> ipf does have the ability to more correctly simulate a closed port.
> I did a similar exercise on my personal OpenBSD firewall box earlier
> this year; I won't go through your whole ruleset, but basically for
> every TCP port you block, you
(This probably belonged on -security or -questions or someplace
else...)
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:55:48 -0500
> From: "Robin P. Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ipfilter / ipnat quandry
>
> - -STABLE (FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Mon Nov 25 14:22:58 EST 20
