On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> AFAIK according to /usr/src/sys/*/param.h, mbuf size if 256 (at least for
DM> i386, see /usr/src/sys/i386/include/param.h, and is not defined for
DM> Alphas);
DM>
DM> and mbcluster size defaults to 2k (I suppose the smallest 2^x to
DM> cover standa
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:04:05AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Dominic Marks wrote:
>
> DM> An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
> DM>
> DM> An mbuf cluster is associated with an area of memory which is used for
> DM> storing more data than yo
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Dominic Marks wrote:
DM> An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
DM>
DM> An mbuf cluster is associated with an area of memory which is used for
DM> storing more data than you can fit in a single mbuf.
DM>
DM> According the D&I 4.4 an mbuf is 128 bytes
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:47:58PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > What is the difference between the "mbufs in use" line and the "mbuf
> > clusters in use" line?
An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
An mbuf cluster is ass
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> What is the difference between the "mbufs in use" line and the "mbuf
> clusters in use" line?
I've wondered precisely this; perhaps one specifically relates to the
network? The farthest I got was netstat(1), which points to a nonexistant
mbuf(9).
L
Hi,
I'm working with a box that is apparently running out of mbufs:
looutput: mbuf allocation failed
looutput: mbuf allocation failed
All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7).
Looking at netstat -m, I get the following:
144/9472/26624 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
134 mbufs
