On 2010-Nov-28 02:24:21 -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
>> a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
>
>With the setup you presented you're going to have a lot of context s
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
> a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
>
Someone please enlighten me if I'm wrong, but I'll take a stab at it.
With the setup you presented you're going to have a lo
Since scheduler issues have been popular lately, I thought I'd
investigate a ULE issue I've been aware of for a while...
I normally have some boinc (ports/astro/boinc) applications running
and I'd noticed that my nightly builds appear to end much sooner when
there's no boinc work units (this has b
