Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands f
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands fixes
the problem until th
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030
> Tristan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
> > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
>
> Does this limitation still exist
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030
Tristan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
> ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
Does this limitation still exist (from 5.3 ERRATA):
While some uncommon configurat
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08:26AM +1030, Tristan wrote:
> can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
> ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
You need to use gvinum on 5-STABLE and -CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, it would be wise to update t
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:
>
> can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ?
gvinum.
> Is gvinum ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
I don't know about RAID5, but 0+1 was working for me in December :)
--
Doug White| Fre
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, se
