Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-13 Thread Jo Rhett
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:01:20AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > One more question: Is gvinum on 6-STABLE's RAID-5 implementation > bit-compatible with R5 on vinum from 4.x/5.x? Would it be possible to > upgrade from vinum on 5.3 to gvinum on 6-STABLE without a dump/restore? Not from 4.x accord

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-12 Thread Brian Szymanski
>> Hmm, I upgraded to 6-STABLE and I'm still having the problem. > > Are you really using the very latest 6-STABLE? Oops - serious egg on my face - my build must have failed and I rebooted without checking the return value (sheepish grin)... I rebuilt and things seem to work now - thanks & sorry f

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Joan Picanyol i Puig
* Brian Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060111 13:01]: > >> But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex) > >> still doesn't persist across a reboot :( > > > > That's a bug; I think it might be related to compiling gvinum in the > > kernel > > as opposed to loading it fro

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:58:34AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer... Great! > > > But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex) > > > still doesn't persist across a reboot :( > > > > That's a bug; I think it might be relat

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Brian Szymanski
Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer... >> I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that >> vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for >> vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old >> vinum >> commands that are

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-10 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:38:29PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that > vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for > vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum > comman

gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
Howdy. I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum commands that are not implemented in gvinum. Lots of basic things I try from