On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 12/14/08, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Can you please relay this feedback to the authors of ext2fuse?
As mentioned earlier in the thread, the ext2fuse code could benefit from
UBLIO-ization. Are you or
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Project itself doesnt look very active, but I may be wrong. It is in alpha state
as reported on SF.
IMHO it is better to maintain our own because it is in better shape, but I'm not
intersted in ext* as developer.
Shelved due to lack of interest, then... others can feel f
On 12/14/08, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>>> Can you please relay this feedback to the authors of ext2fuse?
>>>
>>> As mentioned earlier in the thread, the ext2fuse code could benefit from
>>> UBLIO-ization. Are you or any other volunteers happy to help out here?
>>>
>>
>> Well,
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Can you please relay this feedback to the authors of ext2fuse?
As mentioned earlier in the thread, the ext2fuse code could benefit from
UBLIO-ization. Are you or any other volunteers happy to help out here?
Well, first higher priority would be to fix existing bugs. It
On 12/13/08, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 12/8/08, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>>
>>> I have rolled a port for ext2fuse:
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar
>>>
>>
>> Ignoring fact that is buggy, slooow and port doesnt have any cache
>> implemented
>> an
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 12/8/08, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
I have rolled a port for ext2fuse:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar
Ignoring fact that is buggy, slooow and port doesnt have any cache implemented
and port leaves files behind in share/doc/ext2fuse when
On 12/8/08, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have rolled a port for ext2fuse:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar
Ignoring fact that is buggy, slooow and port doesnt have any cache implemented
and port leaves files behind in share/doc/ext2fuse when package
de
I have rolled a port for ext2fuse:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/fusefs-ext2fs.tar
I look forward to your feedback.
thanks,
BMS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
...
Performance seems quite slow, it could probably benefit from being
ported to use UBLIO as ntfs-3g for FreeBSD has.
I'm going to leave this thing for others to play with, this was a 20
minute bunk-off from other work. It shouldn't take much effort to
create a port
Hi,
I just tested the ext2fuse project on FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE as of today
and found that it works for read/write on an ext3 filesystem. The inode
size was 128 -- I haven't exercised dynamic inode sizes.
ext2fuse project:http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fuse
Required FreeBSD
10 matches
Mail list logo
