On Sun, 02 Apr 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, Brandon D. Valentine
wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> >> It's actually quite easy. The problem is that those kinds of filters
> >> are either so restrictive that they filter posts that they should not,
> >>
> >I'd come up with a filter to defeat this claim, but I'm afraid it
> >will not be employed anyway...
> As far as I'm concerned there are better ways for the project to spend
> its time than catering to the demands of those too lazy to setup their
> own procmail filters. The original poster
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> It's actually quite easy. The problem is that those kinds of filters
>> are either so restrictive that they filter posts that they should not,
>> or so loose as to not really be of much use.
>
>I'd come up with a filter to defeat this claim, but I
> Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >
> > How hard is it to reject messages with blank lines n the body
> > only, or, if there is only non-blank line, to check it for the
> > ``*subscribe''? I know, the mailing list software check the number
> > of crossposts -- this seems even easier...
>
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> How hard is it to reject messages with blank lines n the body only, or,
> if there is only non-blank line, to check it for the ``*subscribe''? I
> know, the mailing list software check the number of crossposts -- this
> seems even easier...
It's actually q
