On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:09:32 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? (was: em0 freezes on ZFS
server) :
DB> at the moment there is not much activity, but if you check the latest
DB> plot.ps you will see that the bottom is slowly increasing, so my bet
DB> is t
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:09:32 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? (was: em0 freezes on ZFS
server) :
DB> > Furthermore I found this via Google:
DB> >
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-December/014062.html>.
This did not hel
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:41:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss
> wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
>
> DB> check:
> DB> ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
> DB> x is seconds, y is mbus current.
>
> Looks not as bad as mine. I had 37k when I re
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:41:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB> check:
DB> ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
DB> x is seconds, y is mbus current.
Looks not as bad as mine. I had 37k when I rebooted the machine some
minutes ago
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:07:13 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB> it's only purpose in life is a nfs server.
I thought so, but you did not mention it explicitely.
DB> but I wouldn't exclude zfs from the equation yet.
DB> I have othere nfs ser
> when I have enough data i'll plot it.
>
check:
ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/plot.ps
x is seconds, y is mbus current.
> Cheers,
> danny
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On 26-2-2010 16:07, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB> > At least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
DB> > does! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd.
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Braniss
> wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
>
> DB> > At least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
> DB> > does! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd. However,
> DB> > they
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
> wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
>
> GK> JC> Note how close the "current" value is to that of "total". I'm not
> GK> JC> too surprised you're seeing what you are as a result
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:37 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server :
DB> > At least in my case I found out what is eating the buffers: nfsd
DB> > does! The buffers stop increasing as soon as I stop nfsd. However,
DB> > they start increasing as soon as
On 26-2-2010 13:44, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
GK> JC> Note how close the "current" value is to that of "total". I'm not
GK> JC> too surprised you're seeing what y
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:38 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
GK> JC> Note how close the "current" value is to that of "total". I'm not
GK> JC> too surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of this.
GK> JC> What
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:03:39 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JC> Note how close the "current" value is to that of "total". I'm not too
JC> surprised you're seeing what you are as a result of this. What on
JC> earth is
On 26-2-2010 13:16, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogel wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV> The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have
JV> sufficient mbufs
JV> to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I'm
On 26-2-2010 13:03, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
This is wat netstat -m told me when it refused to revive em0:
Below are the netstat -m counters/lines of concern:
24980/2087/27067 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
24530/1070/256
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> This is wat netstat -m told me when it refused to revive em0:
Below are the netstat -m counters/lines of concern:
> 24980/2087/27067 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> 24530/1070/25600/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cac
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogel wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV> The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have
JV> sufficient mbufs
JV> to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I'm monitoring mbufs since I rebooted my serv
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:59:28 -0800 Jack Vogel wrote
about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
JV> The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have
JV> sufficient mbufs
JV> to setup the RX ring and buffer structs.
I don't know if this is related, but I upda
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:34:41 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
WJW> Probably the reason why this happened yesterday is that I started
WJW> doing major software builds (over ZFS/NFS/TCP/v3) against data stored
WJW> on this box.
I saw a similar pro
On 26-2-2010 10:58, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:34:41 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote about Re: em0 freezes on ZFS server:
WJW> Probably the reason why this happened yesterday is that I started
WJW> doing major software builds (over ZFS/NFS/TCP/v3) against data stored
WJ
On 25-2-2010 23:59, Jack Vogel wrote:
The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have sufficient
mbufs
to setup the RX ring and buffer structs. Not sure why this results in a
lockup,
but try and increase kern.ipc.nmbclusters.
Let me know what happens,
I've doubled the value 256
The failure to "setup receive structures" means it did not have sufficient
mbufs
to setup the RX ring and buffer structs. Not sure why this results in a
lockup,
but try and increase kern.ipc.nmbclusters.
Let me know what happens,
Jack
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I build an ZFS server based on
Supermicro C2SBX with 8Gb and intel Q9550
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Core2Duo/X38/C2SBX.cfm
with an areca 1120 with 8*1,5T
It has an Inter em0, as in:
Feb 25 14:46:29 zfs kernel: pci0: on pcib0
Feb 25 14:46:29 zfs kernel: em
23 matches
Mail list logo
