Re: em bad performance

2005-12-26 Thread Steven Hartland
g" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Gleb Smirnoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:39 AM Subject: Re: em bad performance Jack Vogel wrote: On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-25 Thread Jack Vogel
On 12/25/05, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) > > > > Jack > > Isn't 'half duplex' meaningless in the gigabit link protocol? > > Scott Yes, but it was meant as a joke, hence the smiley :) _

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-25 Thread Scott Long
Jack Vogel wrote: On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: iperf -c host i'm begining to believe that the problem is elsewhere, i just put in an ethernet nic in a PCI-X/Express slot, and the performance is similar, bad. danny Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duple

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-25 Thread Jack Vogel
On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > iperf -c host > > i'm begining to believe that the problem is elsewhere, i just put in > an ethernet nic in a PCI-X/Express slot, and the performance is similar, bad. > > danny Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) Jack __

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
> On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > D> > D> > > D> > D> Server listening on

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Jack Vogel
On 12/22/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 > D> > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) >

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> > D> D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 D> > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D> > D> ---

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D> > D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 > D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) > D> > D> [ 4] local 132

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> D> Server listening on TCP port 5001 D> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) D> D> [ 4] local 132.65.16.100 p

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > D>this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > D> one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > D> a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > D> > D> the em performance un

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: D> this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, D> one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is D> a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). D> D> the em performance under 6.0-st

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-22 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > hi, > > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > > > the em performanc

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-21 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > hi, > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > the em performance under 6.0-

Re: em bad performance

2005-12-21 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 17:55, Danny Braniss wrote: > this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, > one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is > a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). > > the em performance under 6.0-stable is h

em bad performance

2005-12-21 Thread Danny Braniss
hi, this particular mb, intel sr1435vp2, has 2 ethernets, one is an Intel '82547EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller', the other is a Marvell (which seems that the driver is around the corner). the em performance under 6.0-stable is half of any other box i have, and a similar mb running linux gi